
Rugby

Share
29th December 2014
10:31pm GMT

Fitzgerald is correct - the players do owe O'Connor but do they truly believe O'Connor is the man to lead the club to another European Cup? I doubt it.
Word on O'Connor is that he is well regarded by the wider playing staff but he does not strike fear, or impose himself, on his men. Both Cheika and Schmidt were meticulous and driven but had no problem getting their point across to their players. O'Connor is amiable and has some nice ideas on how he wants to play the game but he is lacking in ruthlessness and invention.
Another worrying snippet came from captain Jamie Heaslip three weeks ago when, in defending O'Connor, he suggested the team was less "robotic" under the Australian than under Schmidt. Leinster supporters would love to have some of that robotic style - like the one that destroyed Ulster 42-14 in the 2012 Heineken Cup final - back.
Schmidt was famed for his forensic analysis of opposition weak points. Nacewa's tries from cross-field kicks (against Ospreys in 2011/12 and Scarlets in 2012/13) and Jamie Heaslip's try against Biarritz in the Challenge Cup (after a cleverly worked line-out) may be seen as trick plays but they were effective and have been sorely absent during O'Connor's tenure.
One look at Leinster's coaching staff gives an insight into the team's lack of a cutting edge. There is no dedicated backs coach. The brain-trust is O'Connor, Marco Caputo (a former hooker), Leo Cullen (lock) and Richie Murphy (out-half).
O'Connor was a centre in his playing days but the game has moved on since his peak - a Test cap in 1994 - and Welford Road, Leicester is a breeding ground for forwards rather than incisive backline moves.
Leinster surely dangled a coach job at Brian O'Driscoll ahead of his retirement but they should take another pass in the summer. Whether or not O'Connor is there for 2015/16 may well depend on a huge four games in 21 days, starting with Ulster on Saturday and ending with a trip to Coventry on 24 January.Explore more on these topics: